Ending

     Everyone? Not one survivor?  I don't surely understand why people died at specific times.  The less amounts of guiltiness go at the start. I get this because they don't have to know what is going on.  Anthony Marston's death was more accidental than all the rest, but he felt no guilt for the crime he committed.  Lombard should have died last because he did not feel guilty for allowing twenty-one men to die.  Vera Claythorne felt the most guilty out of all the criminals, and made the person she did the crime for extremely upset.  She had more of a premeditated murder than all of the rest, so I understand her placement in death.  One of the deaths I actually agree with is at the very end, the main murderer's actual death.  He killed a ton of people purposefully.  He did not feel guilty, and even had fun plotting and committing the crimes.  Lawrence (Justice) Wargrave deserved to die last because he was most guilty.  He liked mysteries so much, he committed suicide to make one better.  That is just plain balmy.
      All of the deaths went along with the type of person.  Like Blore always says things about bears concerning death, and that was how he died, from a bear- shaped clock.  Antony Marston drank so much, he died from a drink.  Mrs. Rogers fainted (like sleeping), and was fount not living from not waking up.  Lombard brought the revolver for safety sort of, and was killed from it.  Others deaths went along with the characters.  The one really guilty was not truly suspected.  He led all the meetings, but always said who could have done it, where he would always be on the list.  Wargrave never said him being guilty was out of the ordinary, or that he was innocent.  At least the oook is fictional, so I do not have to worry that much about all judges.  Agatha Christie has a really imaginative brain, and likely very weird opinions, based off of And Then There Were None.